My Article: Bordeaux 2010 Futures Not A Success?

I think we can pretty much say that sale of Bordeaux 2010 futures was not a success this year. All the wine merchants I speak to from the United States to the United Kingdom to France to Hong Kong say that they are having trouble to sell Bordeaux 2010.

Sure, a few wines have sold well such as Pontet Canet, Beychevelle, Montrose, Lynch Bages, Vieux Château Certan and others. But on a whole, most wines didn’t sell very well.

“It’s just too expensive,” said one UK wine merchant. ‘My customers say that they think the Bordelaise are joking.”

I just got this in an email (honestly minutes ago!) from a big wine merchant in Hong Kong: “2010 Lafite for 600 Euros released from chateau? This guy must be on drugs.”

I don’t think many wine merchants in the world are selling first growth Bordeaux 2010 yet. Apparently very little was released on the market at the opening price. So merchants are waiting for the second or third offerings, called tranches, to average the prices. Will the world really want first growth futures at $1,000 to $1,200 a bottle?

 Anyway, first growths are just one part of the Bordeaux market. And on a whole, Bordeaux 2010 futures have not been an easy sell. It’s been awhile since Bordeaux has had a great vintage that didn’t sell well as futures or en primeur. If I remember correctly, the last time was 1990. That outstanding vintage sold very slowly as futures as the world braced for the worst with the Gulf War. But it sold well in bottle later as a string of weak vintages followed in Bordeaux and markets such as the United States sought out top wines.

It will be interesting to follow the progress of Bordeaux 2010. Wine merchants tell me they are now focusing on recent vintages in bottle such as 2000 and 2005, which isometimes cost less than 2010 .

One thing is for sure though. The 2010 vintage is an outstanding oe with some truly extraordinary wines. The question now is where else can prices go but down for a while…

 

SHARE ON:
FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmail

Leave comment

You must be logged in to post comment. LOG IN

5 thoughts on “My Article: Bordeaux 2010 Futures Not A Success?

  1. PrimordialOne says:
    I was particularly shocked at the pricing of the first growth's seconds for 2010. Absurd.
  2. mscott says:
    I know some Bordeaux lovers who are nervous about how much they spent - en primeur - for the '09s. A lot of merchants are really going for the older vintages, like you said James, and I don't blame them. When you can find a '95 Margaux (which is truly exceptional) for around $700, why pay around $1,000 for a '10 that you can't cellar for two years, beyond the fact that you would not want to open it till probably 2030? Alas, no 2010 futures for me. I am finding a lot of fine '05s, '03s, '00s and older for a price that is closer to fair.

    Interesting times for Bordeaux-freaks!
  3. Vinifera says:
    I'm wine merchant, I honestly think the reason for the slowness is also to be tied to prices of 2009, many people bought both 2009 and have not had the benefits they expected. The sale of 2009 was fast, customers appeared to be in "trance", this year are much more careful
  4. lawineco says:
    could not agree more,
  5. Vines says:
    James, as you said much earlier, would you want to spend $1200.00 for a 2010 1st Growth that you would need to wait 10-12 years to mature, or a 1985 1st Growth that would be delicious now for the same price?